I'm confused then, as the /v4l2-async/pending_async_subdevices results are the opposite of what I'm expecting.
- There is nothing in the kernel logs from your first post indicating an issue. The sensor has probed with "[ 8.145639] arducam-pivariety 10-000c: firmware version: 0x10003", and pending_async_subdevices lists both devices. You should therefore have /dev/video0 available.
- Anything after the colon means that the device before the colon is waiting on the device after the colon. So Unicam is waiting for the sensor when you say "uart_enabled=1 commented out".
Do note that the correct entry is "enable_uart=1", not "uart_enabled=1". I'm assuming that's a typo.
If you want well designed and reasonably well supported modules, then Soho Enterprises may be an option. I don't know what he's charging for the IMX462 modules though. viewtopic.php?t=306964 and https://soho-enterprise.com/2023/01/29/ ... ono-color/
- There is nothing in the kernel logs from your first post indicating an issue. The sensor has probed with "[ 8.145639] arducam-pivariety 10-000c: firmware version: 0x10003", and pending_async_subdevices lists both devices. You should therefore have /dev/video0 available.
- Anything after the colon means that the device before the colon is waiting on the device after the colon. So Unicam is waiting for the sensor when you say "uart_enabled=1 commented out".
Do note that the correct entry is "enable_uart=1", not "uart_enabled=1". I'm assuming that's a typo.
If you want well designed and reasonably well supported modules, then Soho Enterprises may be an option. I don't know what he's charging for the IMX462 modules though. viewtopic.php?t=306964 and https://soho-enterprise.com/2023/01/29/ ... ono-color/
Statistics: Posted by 6by9 — Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:34 pm